An article in today’s Daily Mail, which I shan’t link to (see this one instead ) suggests that the late Stephen Gately died an “unnatural death” as a result of his

(a) Homosexuality

(b) Civil partnership

I have for many years refused to touch the daily mail without gloves for it’s highminded, bigoted right wing view of the world, but this is the final straw.  I am not Homosexual (as if that mattered), I also didn’t really enjoy the music of Boyzone, and was astonished to hear that Gately had a solo career, but for one ill informed journalist to suggest that “33 year old men don’t simply put on their pyjamas and fall asleep and die” is factually incorrect – sadly, many men (and women) do, every year – and Jan Moir does each and every one of them a disservice and a disrespect by suggesting not.

The Daily Mail whipped itself into a frenzy about the Ross/Brand baiting of a member of the band, the “Satanic Sluts” – core DM territory, I know.

May I propose that a campaign is now launched to force the resignation or sacking of Ms Moir immediately.  Not least because of the clear breach of 4 sections of the PCC code.

But given that Paul Dacre is chairing the PCC now I won’t hold my breath for any strong action.

Posted by: jimh76 | September 19, 2009

Perfect film music

I’m off racing at Spa next week, and on the way intend to do a little respect paying at Dunkirk and Ypres.  I have recently unearthed the military history of my Great Grandfather (an Irish Republican) who served with the Royal Munster Fusiliers through Gallipoli, Palestine and the Western Front – being Gassed and eventually sent home to die 6 years later.

In advance of my crossing to Dunkirk I have been re-watching “Atonement” – a film I avoided through a general dislike of Kiera Knightly’s work.  I wish I hadn’t.  It’s an absolute gem of a film, and what really stands out for me is one particular scene, which is an equal to anything by David Lean, in which a full 5 minute 20 second steadicam scene is run across the evacuation beaches at Bray Dunes.  What really makes this scene of absolute pathos – the bottling up and attempted destruction of Britain’s regular army, is the absolutely perfect music which accompanies it.

Bray Dunes - as seen in "Atonement"

Bray Dunes - as seen in "Atonement"

It’s a piece entitled “Elegy for Dunkirk” by Dario Marianelli – which, as a function of the action on screen segues through a group of soldiers singing “Dear Lord and Father of Mankind”  It’s perfect, and comes close to bringing a tear to my eye every time I hear it.  It’s so linked into the real horror of war – not the short stint of uniformed service put in by me, after the Cold War and before the present disaster in the Middle East.

I’m trying to think of another piece of Music which so captures the mood of a scene and point in history, and I’m struggling.

Posted by: jimh76 | September 13, 2009

The Beatles Remastered?

OK, so I only bought two of the albums for comparison purposes (Abbey Road and Revolver since you ask  – my two favourites) and I have to say, that despite my reticence, they’re pretty good, a bit like when the 60’s Bond movies got “done” a couple of years back – although the change there was magnificent and visual cleanups are easier to spot than audio ones.

A Masterpiece in vinyl, acetate, Polycarbonate or bits

A Masterpiece in vinyl, acetate, Polycarbonate or bits

However, I miss something about the imperfection of vinyl, i know all the bits on my copies of Abbey Road, Revolver and Rubber soul where there’s a little crackle, a hint of pop and I quite like it.  I have my father’s copy of Revolver, which is frankly shagged, and every time I hear Taxman I expect it to get stuck repeating “Mr Wilson, Mr Heath” until I reach over and move the stylus.

No, I’m delighted that the remasters are here – if it means that a new generation can understand REAL pop and in a deeper way, the disintigration of human relationships.

All I want now is for someone to buy me the Beatles Rockband with all the instruments – you know my name (look up my number)

Posted by: jimh76 | September 3, 2009

What’s the most irritating thing?

I’ll advance that it’s when a person who has invested in technology then fails to use it.  Specifically, it’s when you try, at a reasonable hour of the day to get hold of someone with a blackberry, a mobile phone and numerous other means of communication to find only that they are forwarding to that work of beelzebub, voice mail (and with a dash of Mephistopheles in that there wasn’t even a personalised message!).

The creator of voicemail hard at work

The creator of voicemail hard at work

I remonstrate with this friend of mine, and hear that the core “benefit” of technology 2.0 is that it can be switched off! – Now this would be a convincing argument if it weren’t for the plaintive way in which the mobile (the acquisition of which was a major event) was brandished as if it’s very presence in the room was proof of its’ worth.

Well – I say, if you have the technology, and you make people aware of your ownership; it is only right that they can assume that your non response is a deliberate snub – you know I’m right

Posted by: jimh76 | August 21, 2009

Oh alright then

My old chum the Brandy Balloonist has asked formore thoughts and ramblings from me.  So I feel inclined to offer them.

I have of late been living my life through the cinema – rather like something from the dreadful Schwarzenegger film “the last action hero” – except I see myself, not as an overmuscled Austrian peculiarity, but rather through the prism of TE Lawrence, Mr Bridger, Lt Chard and most presciently “The Godfather”.  You see I’ve just found another job, and will shortly be ready to settle all “family business” before I go.

He even looks like someone I work with...

He even looks like someone I work with...

This is something of a worry.  Not because I don’t want to descend into the realms of being a complete Walter Mitty (God knows there are enough of them in my locale) but because try as I might, I just can’t do the sinister, brooding intensity of a Marlon Brando.

No – family business aside, I have to say that today’s comparison of me to Mr Bridger is probably closer the mark – and I’m not sure I like it all that much!

Dont worry, theyll get better

Don't worry, they'll get better

Anyway, heres to a weekend of practising regal waves and tossing off a quick song at the piano…

Noel – they will get better – I’m very tired though!

Posted by: jimh76 | May 27, 2008

Blogging from the land of chauvanism

The most popular entry on my blog is the defence of French Chauvanism (Parte Deux) – don’t ask me why (although I suspect the reference to Walt Disney might have something to do with it) – So I’m pleased to say that today I just about arrived a Paris with Mrs Rambler for a well needed week away.

We’re staying in the opulent surroundings of the Hotel Regina – which, if you’re a film buff is the hotel in the Bourne Identity dripping with Art Nouveau trimmings in Paris, next to the Golden statue of Jeanne D’Arc, which draws crowds of right wing Buffoons laying wreaths on behalf of the French Front Nationale once every year – hopefully not this week though!

What is rather amusing, however is that we have been placed in Room 101.  Now, before the BBC got hold of it Room 101 had a lineage in the Orwell novel 1984

“You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world.”

However, our Room 101 is very nice, with a 25 foot high ceiling and lovely 2nd Empire furniture.  But we very nearly didn’t get here.

We decided, in honour of the move of Eurostar to St Pancras to forgo our usual chauffeured car ride to London and take the train.  Mistake number one.

Mistake number two was to throw ourselves on the mercy of the new British railway ticketing system and get an off peak ticket.  This results in the staff at Bedford station holding back the hordes, in case they might get on a train whoch gets in five minutes earlier (all because paying for a ticket inspector to enforce fair fares and public safety is an unpleasant extra for the private rail companies) – when they did let us through (2 minutes early – pass round the OBEs) the train was sent off to sidings and we had to wait for another to arrive, from the sidings…

The train then stopped just outside Luton, and it was apparently beyond the wit of the operator to reroute the train and keep us moving (given that it was an 8 line stretch), no, we had to change trains, twice, whilst various halfwitted employees flitted about trying deperately not to help any customers.

We then got a 4 carriage train for the accumulated people of two 8 carriage trains – guess what that was like.

In the end, we only just got to the train on time – but in passing did see “Dogshit” Rory from season 3 of the apprentice wandering across the concourse at St Pancras

Yes, I thought you might have forgotten him too..

What struck me was that we have done brilliantly with St Pancras (as a nation), but it’s a fluke, a mistake – should never have had British trains coming into it.  I’ve spoken before about livery being unimportant on trains, but I hold that the appearance and bearing of employees IS something to comment on.  I don’t care if they have pink scarves, pink shirts, blue pants or purple hats, in fact they could re-introduce the old BR Kepis if they wanted to – as long as the people wearing them look like they give a monkeys about how they look – because, guess what, when people look competent and proud, they sometimes get away with being a little less than competent by giving a convincing act.  First Capital Connect take note.

And if you ever do read this at FCC – he was a spotty youth with his trousers at MC Hammer level and a sullen look – I’d give him some intensive retraining if I were you.

Anyway – it’s been a stressful first day – but we’re here now – so more blogging from the land of Steak Tartare (very nice) and escargots – (also lovely) to come

Posted by: jimh76 | April 26, 2008

How journalism works, part 1

“Strike shuts Scotland’s only refinery”

“Pipeline to be shutdown due to strike”

“30% of British Oil production shut down by stikers”

then

“Government slams panic buying of petrol”

“Public warned not to panic buy”

Can anyone else see the problem with this run of stories? – The British press act like a boy who persuades his mate to break next door’s windows and then join the next door neighbour in condemning the boy for breaking them in the first place.

And my old friends, the BBC website have a couple blogging about their journey to Scotland, including the enourmous difficulties they are having getting fuel… except that they aren’t – but because of that the story sits a long way below “Minister urges end to panic buying”

Why would that be?

“The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being loved.”

Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince

Oh, and do we really think that 3 days of stopped production would wipe out UK reserves? – Er no, but there’s no story in that.

Posted by: jimh76 | April 23, 2008

Is it a man, or is it a rod?

BBC NEWS | England | Hereford/Worcs | Speakers back for Rod tribute act

Separated at birth

“Separated at birth?”

Here we go again with the BBC’s endless slide into “celebrity culture” – Imagine my surprise when perusing the BBC News website to find that a man, who seemingly impersonates a Rod (I expected him to be much thinner) had had his speakers stolen.

It was only when I was taken in by this premise, of a man masquerading as a long cylyndrical piece of wood that it became clear that a man known as a Rod Stewart “lookalike” (judge for yourself) had had his speakers nicked… and then returned.

Two things

1 – Why should “Rod” be enough for the average person to understand the story described by the headline?

2 – Why was the petty theft of a man’s speakers front page news?

Answers on a postcard…

Posted by: jimh76 | April 20, 2008

School Days

This weekend my random association with Facebook has taken on a different hue entirely, with the appearance of a load of people I went to school with.  This has been a genuinely interesting experience, as there are a good number of them I just don’t remember at all, but alarmingly they seem to know me.

Was I really in CDT with this bloke?

It’s amusing seeing the pictures of these people today – I’d like to thank the person who said I “looked like Vic Reeves, but a bit bigger, well you know”.  This person even helpfully posted a picture of my Tutor group taken in 1990, and I have to say that, not only do I not remember a number of the other people in the group (I was in class with them for 5 years!) – I don’t remember the teacher, and appalingly, don’t remember it being taken…

A couple of things were brought home.

(1) I hated school, no, I mean it, it was purgatory

and

(2) The people I am interested in getting back in touch with probably consider me in the same way as I consider some of the mystery folks – a nothing,

I notice that most of the people I used to get on with look much thinner and healthier than me.  I notice that the people who were absolute dunces at school and didn’t give a monkeys about passing exams are now earning three times my salary and keep posting pictures of themselves travelling the world.

I note that the most inarticulate buffoon has actually sprouted quite a good prose style in his “superwall posts”

So what does this tell me? – That envy really is a bad thing, that schooldays were not the “best days of my life”, that I am well and truly best off out of the West London ghetto I grew up in and, I suppose that academic success, no matter what we were told by the pompous arse of a headmaster, is most certainly not the route of success and riches (I mean, there’s a bloke who used to get me to do his Economics homework, whilst I played games on his Commodore Amiga who is now a Dubai based lawyer (also about half his original weight))

Bloody hell, reminiscing can be very hard sometimes.

Posted by: jimh76 | April 6, 2008

Flame of indignation

I never thought I’d feel this way, being a law abiding, fairly conservative (note the small ‘c’) person.  But I’m extremely proud of those people who disrupted the passage of the Olympic flame through London today.

The dreadful bleating that I’ve heard about the “sacred” nature of the torch and the dross of people dressed like things of a greek vase lighting the flame with the rays of the sun drives me bonkers.  The whole flame procession thing was originally dreamt up by the Nazis for the 1936 games, to demonstrate Aryan supremacy (the parabolic mirrors used to light the torch were made by German firm Karl Zeiss)

China has a disgraceful record on human rights, it has quite patently unlawfully occupied Tibet for many years and it has wrapped itself in the legitimacy of the Olympics, saying that this is “not the time to bring up personal political views”…

Lord Coe, judo partner to the balding former leader of the Conservative party says that “sport has done more than politics to solve world problems”

Really…

In 1980 and 1984 two major boycotts of the Olympic games occurred effectively because the USA and USSR dissaproved of each other’s political systems, Afghanistan was a smokescreen.  We now have a games occuring in a country which, when it executes a person sends the bill for the bullet to the family of the executed person.

Politics aside, let’s look at the “procession” itself.

A bus, a number of motorbikes, some third rate celebrities (I mean, “Former Blue Peter Presenter Konnie Huq – for Christ’s sake) The chinese ambassador – running through Chinatown in a cunning detour – I mean, who’d have guessed it. and more police than one might otherwise see in a year. Although it was nice to see that they took the opportunity to highlight the current rise in British Cycling by riding on some rather tatty looking mountain bikes.

The whole thing was one of these American inspired farces, a triumph of presentation over substance – it serves absolutely no good purpose.

I say “well done” to the protesters, and I hope that at least 1% of them were there for reasons of taste and decency as well as to support Tibet.

Grrrrr.

Older Posts »

Categories